Wiki and ticker/bug reports
You need to be logged in to post messages in the forums. New users may register here.
|
Niklas Gunnäs
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 5
|
Wednesday 21 February 2007 3:35:40 pm
Will it be included later?
|
|
|
Kristof Coomans
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 66
|
Wednesday 28 February 2007 2:11:36 am
Yes, it will be included later. I will investigate if it's feasible to use the previous eZ publish issue system as a base.
|
|
|
Niklas Gunnäs
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 5
|
Tuesday 06 March 2007 1:26:27 pm
What would be a nice solution, Have you got any answer from ez yet?
|
|
|
Kristof Coomans
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 66
|
Wednesday 07 March 2007 10:42:42 am
Hi Niklas
Sorry, I didn't have time yet to take a look at it. I will keep you informed.
|
|
|
kracker
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 27
|
Tuesday 13 March 2007 1:38:32 am
Why can we simply not speak with waterproof and make them an offer to get a copy of WiT for our own needs. It might seem off but I don't see cost as the problem ... we all will be using components soon enough ...
Still... I am for the old issue tracker being shared as free software, just not getting hung up in the politics of the e.Z.
//kracker
|
|
|
Paul Forsyth
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 20
|
Tuesday 13 March 2007 3:12:10 am
Since projects.ez.no is intended to be maintained by eZ in the long run we should simply be able to use issues.ez.no?
At the very least this would get things moving in the short term...
Paul
|
|
|
kracker
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 27
|
Tuesday 13 March 2007 4:06:14 am
|
|
|
Paul Forsyth
Member since:
09 January 2008
Posts: 20
|
Tuesday 13 March 2007 4:19:18 am
Another option is to have eZ 'contribute' their old bug tracker which should be pretty simple to integrate?
The old bug tracker could go on as a project here to refine...
It really depends on what is needed.
Paul
|
|
You need to be logged in to post messages in the forums. New users may register here.
